Publication Ethics

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining the integrity of the research and its presentation is helped by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include:

  • The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
  • The submitted work should be original and should not have been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid concerns about text-recycling (self-plagiarism).
  • A single study should not be split up into several parts to increase the number of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (i.e. ‘salami-slicing/publishing’).
  • Concurrent or secondary publication is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. Examples include translations or a manuscript that is intended for a different group of readers.
  • Results should be presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation (including image-based manipulation). Authors should adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting, and processing data.
  • No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (‘plagiarism’). Proper acknowledgments to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized, and/or paraphrased), quotation marks (to indicate words taken from another source) are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions secured for material that is copyrighted.

Peer Review Policy

All research articles published in the Journal of Science, Innovation and Creativity undergo full peer review, the key characteristics of which are listed below:

  • All research articles are peer-reviewed by at least two suitably qualified experts.
  • All publication decisions are made by the journal's Editor-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided.
  • Members of the international Editorial Boards lend insight, advice, and guidance to the Editor-in-Chief generally and assist in decision-making on specific submissions.
  • Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows the Journal of Science, Innovation and Creativity to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers, and editors alike.
  • Journal of Science, Innovation and Creativity additionally benefits through the manuscript referral process from the high-quality peer review conducted by established journals.